Hello all, I think snakes and latters is a old classic. It's a shame we don't have it on here yet, I hope we get it soon. Thoughts?

We won't, because online, that game just means press enter until it is over, with no decisions to make.

I really think its a shame that we don't have this game here, I mean, if people wan't it, why not have it. sometimes people just wan't to try their luck. if you don't like just pressing enter, then don't play it. press enter official game is also just pressing enter. we could also add an option to move your token manually like how we do in backgammon. also, it will be more fun if we add token sounds, like animal sounds vehicle sounds etcetra. I don't think my view will be heard, but just wanted to put it here.

Hello,
every view is heard, and you should definitely put your view out there. After all, without differing views, there's no forum.

That being said, keep in mind the purpose of the Press enter game: It was an April fool's joke of 2022, and it is in fact clearly designed to be a parody of these games where you just do nothing but press enter. Even so, as long as you understand the principle of the game, the press enter game is actually more involved than Snakes and ladders.

Snakes and ladders is a wonderful game for kids to learn how to move a token on a board, to understand how to play a dice game, and to practice counting. Other than that, I really don't see any fun of it, especially online.
In fact, it is so basic that you can already play this game on the Playroom, by using a free table and the dice feature, along with some imagination.

Certainly there are better ways to spend time than creating 10 different press enter games…

agreed with the press enter game engagement, that being said, its nice to go back to being kids sometimes, certainly not something that should go on top of the to do list, but its still worth considering especially due to the symbolicness and popularity.

Well putting out views as part of a forum doesn't work out here is what a lot of us have seen with various topics before

http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic103893
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum2000000/topic107195
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic118808
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic114186
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic121130
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic106970
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic109645
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum6000000/topic113372
http://qcsalon.net/en/forum2000000/topic98409
etc.

Hello,
surely you can explain to me how your links 4, 5, 6 7 and 8 demonstrate being unable to share your opinion on this forum?
In regards to 5, 6 and 8 nobody disagreed with anything, while 7 is a clear bug report that will most likely be handled whenever the next update of the client happens. In the 4th one there are some minor questions being discussed, but both sides definitely expressed their opinions.

I saved the third one since it is mine, and again I don't see anything that demonstrates your point here. Some were for this suggestion, some weren't, both sides explained themselves, and we went on.

In short, all of them are topics on standby, that may or may not be resolved in the future. For the bug report obviously that takes a higher priority and I'll most likely give a reminder whenever the focus is shifted to the development of a new client version, in fact I already have a list of important client bugs to bring up at the relevant time, your report being on that list long before this "Snakes and ladders" topic was even created.

The only legitimate cases are your links 1 and 2, but even then, nobody was disallowed to express their view. The given suggestions weren't implemented, with a clear reason and an explanation. You may not agree with those explanations, that's completely fine of course, but to be honest I also don't see what will bringing the same two suggestions up over and over in completely irrelevant topics achieve. For the first topic on your list, the developer said sorry for not taking the most popular choice in post 37 of that topic twice, so after that, I don't know what is the expectation.

I am more than interested in a constructive discussion, but going from a simple Snakes and ladders suggestion into every suggestion on your list that wasn't implemented in a satisfactory time period doesn't feel like having one.

Edit: The same thing applies for the sneaky edit and the 9th link you added later. Who wasn't allowed to share their opinion and why?

Guys we are going away from the topic as usual, blind people are so dramatic lol. Look farkle, shut the boxes, the official press enter game, those are all just pressing enter. At least snakes and latters is fun, plus we can add our own rules to make it more challenging. It was just a thought anyway.

@wolfi,
lol i disagree with your point,.
not all are dramatic.

I think you proved my point by responding lol. I ended up ordering the game online, I got an amazing board been playing with the fam for a while. Y'all should check it out good memories.

I'm pretty sure generic stereotypical statements without evidence do not qualify as a point

@ post1. I agree with your suggestion.